More journo-terrorism as left-wing media threatens to dox Microsoft employee for pointing out discrimination against whites

The perpetually angry American Left has launched an all-out assault on what remains of “traditional” America, including the complete debasing of whites and destruction of any cultural contribution they have had on our country.

If Leftist mobs aren’t tearing down statues or punching white persons who dare to express any support for our president, journo-terrorists are threatening the health, safety, and well-being of any white person who dares to even suggest that, hey, the Left isn’t treating white people very well.

Case in point, as reported by Information Liberation: Members of the garbage establishment media have threatened to dox a female Microsoft staffer after she observed on an internal company message board that “senior leadership is awarded more money if they discriminate against Asians and white men.”

Quartz, a Leftist site trying hard to become another garbage establishment media destination, said those comments were an attack on “diversity” before threatening to dox her in response.

The message: Color outside the lines of Left-wing political, cultural, and societal thought and you will be punished and threatened. So much for “inclusivity” and “tolerance.” The Left wants diversity in skin color as long as it isn’t white skin; the Left wants ‘diversity’ of thought as long as it’s just a variation of “acceptable” thought; the Left tolerates only speech with which it agrees; the Left instinctively treats all whites with disdain, even those “on their side.”

“Reporter” Dave Gershgorn noted:

Two posts on the board criticizing Microsoft diversity initiatives as “discriminatory hiring” and suggesting that women are less suited for engineering roles have elicited more than 800 comments, both affirming and criticizing the viewpoints, multiple Microsoft employees have told Quartz. The posts were written by a female Microsoft program manager. Quartz reached out to her directly for comment, and isn’t making her name public at this point, pending her response.

What’s so different from journalists terrorizing people and actual terrorists?

“Pending her response?” If that isn’t an overt threat to reveal her identity just for the sake of ensuring she is harassed and threatened (and maybe even hurt), then nothing is. 

And mind you, the posts were not racist, classist, or any “-ist.” They were legitimately posted and contained legitimate concerns. (Related: Limbaugh: ‘Impeachment for Trump will be different than it was for Clinton’ because of the fake news media.)

“Does Microsoft have any plans to end the current policy that financially incentivizes discriminatory hiring practices? To be clear, I am referring to the fact that senior leadership is awarded more money if they discriminate against Asians and white men,” said one of the original posts on Yammer, a Microsoft-owned messaging platform used by the company.

“I have an ever-increasing file of white male Microsoft employees who have faced outright and overt discrimination because they had the misfortune of being born both white and male. This is unacceptable,” the program manager said.

Here’s another bit of heresy the female program manager wrote:

“Because women used to be actively prohibited from full-time employment many decades ago, there is now the misguided belief that women SHOULD work, and if women AREN’T working, there’s something wrong…. Many women simply aren’t cut out for the corporate rat race, so to speak, and that’s not because of ‘the patriarchy,’ it’s because men and women aren’t identical, and women are much more inclined to gain fulfillment elsewhere.”

What about those posts is threatening? Or wrong? Or racist? They sound like perfectly legitimate concerns, and at a time when whites who don’t live on the Democrat plantation are being compared to the KKK and white supremacists, they happen to be very timely concerns as well.

But not to Quartz hacks and other Left-wing pretend journalists who use the profession as a platform for their perceived version of “social justice” rather than to educate and inform readers.

And to terrorize.

Sources include:

comments powered by Disqus